|
Would you be surprised if that actually happened? Have the Mickeysofties ever washed their hands in innocence? They did not explicitly guarantee anything, after all. They don't even guarantee that their stuff is fit for any particular use. Forget this and you already are on your way to the Dark Side. Have them add 'Sith Lord' to the titles on your business cards. 
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said, if they make breaking changes to something in .NET we're all in trouble
They'd have to change the behavior of the ThreadLocal<t> class provided in .NET 4
Now they *could*. Of course they could. They could also make a breaking change to System.String, or System.Threading.Thread.
Nobody is safe. Hide your children.
The truth is, whenever you use someone else's library, you run that risk if you rely on it.
That's the nature of software development and this is as true of the less used types like ThreadLocal as is is to more intrinsic and common types like System.String
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
And you'll write this up as a short article, right? 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think that might do more harm than good! 
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's T4 template engine uses entire different context switch tags (<# #>) than its asp/asp.net context switch tags (<% %>) for no other reason I can discern other than to make porting them back and forth more painful.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Because, you know, never waste the occasion to piss-off your customers
while (!(success = Try()));
|
|
|
|
|
That seems to be the highest goal of each and every company these days. Mickeysoft has lost its monopoly on that.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Because they could. That's called design by committee. The guys who sit there can talk all day without deciding anything. That is further complicated by everyone having his own agenda, which often has nothing to do with any technical concerns. In some cases not even remotely with reality.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
modified 6-Sep-19 10:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably designed by a different team? And could be useful to tell them apart?
|
|
|
|
|
i'm not sure anyone would have a hard time figuring out which was which. I'm sure it was a different design team but they used all other aspects of ASP syntax lie <*= and <*@ - they simply changed the percents to hashes.
i don't know. I can do a couple of dodgy search and replaces to fix it but i wouldn't want to have to rely on that. thankfully i'm not in this situation much.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe to make it easier to generate an ASP.NET file from a T4 template?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, now that's a use case I hadn't considered. You might be right. I could see MS engineering for that when they released T4 - even intending it for such a thing.
Although it still seems a bit silly, like using asp to render asp pages.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Because I like this theme.
For the fourth time, he is high up in mountains, not laughing nearby. (3,3)
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Pac(-)Man sort of fits, but I can't see it in the clue...
|
|
|
|
|
The game is Far cry. In 4th edition, the story takes place in Himalayas.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
The "Import article from Github" feature you have added to this site is excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
yes to this
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Admiration, illusion? (3, 8)
Just realized my mistake. Missed The first word.
So probably kind of ruined by the mistake, the answer is The Prestige. I've seen that movie 4 or 5 times, yet I didn't know it had the article before. 
Prestige is admiration on the basis of perception and the word comes from the Latin Praestegium or Praestigiae or French Prestige all meaning illusion. While pointing to the illusions/magic/magician.
modified 6-Sep-19 8:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
PHANTASM?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I get the definite feeling you are going to be back up on Monday!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I would like that, today's CC was intentionally difficult. I wanted to set the theme for next week.
|
|
|
|
|
I made a mistake, perhaps you'd like to take another look.
|
|
|
|
|
Magician?
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
