Welcome to the Lounge

Steve Naidamast28-Dec-23 4:30

Steve Naidamast

28-Dec-23 4:30

From what I understand, the international standards community has not even had the language cleaned of its "dead code", making it more bloated than it has to be...

Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
Black Falcon Software, Inc.
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

jschell28-Dec-23 5:29

28-Dec-23 5:29

Steve Naidamast wrote:
has not even had the language cleaned of its "dead code

That should not surprise anyone. Removing a feature from a language is always problematic.

MSBassSinger28-Dec-23 4:35

MSBassSinger

28-Dec-23 4:35

Quote:
even as the industry is putting greater and greater demands on it

I would think the industry as a whole is not putting greater demands on JavaScript - just the community of developers who are dedicated to JavaScript and fight tooth and nail to keep from switching to a better language.

I think the industry as a whole has recognized JavaScript's limitations (and labor costs to implement) and created the market that gave rise to WebAssembly on the front end and desktop, and higher level compiled languages for server apps.

honey the codewitch28-Dec-23 4:41

28-Dec-23 4:41

As I recall, node.js is a google project, not a community project.

Maybe I'm wrong.

But nodejs is probably the biggest single offender here, in terms of technology.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

MSBassSinger28-Dec-23 5:14

MSBassSinger

28-Dec-23 5:14

Quote:
As I recall, node.js is a google project, not a community project.

Wikipedia article on Node.js
"Node.js is a cross-platform, open-source JavaScript runtime environment that can run on Windows, Linux, Unix, macOS, and more. Node.js runs on the V8 JavaScript engine, and executes JavaScript code outside a web browser."

Interestingly, Ryan Dahl, who created node.js, also created the TypeScript engine.

honey the codewitch28-Dec-23 5:50

28-Dec-23 5:50

I realize it's open source as many google projects are, but I think google funds it and google staffers are primary contributors.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

honey the codewitch28-Dec-23 5:52

28-Dec-23 5:52

Digging further, it looks like I could be mistaken about Google's involvement.

It looks like it gets a significant amount of it's support from the Linux Foundation, which also supports some other projects like zephyrproject that i use.

OpenJS Foundation - Wikipedia[^]

I'd say this counts as industry rather than community in any case, as LF is a major influencer in the direction of a lot of software technology these days.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

jschell28-Dec-23 5:27

28-Dec-23 5:27

Steve Naidamast wrote:
a crappy language if there ever was one

You need to get out more?

There are a vast number of languages. Many of them very annoying.

The 'standard' for SQL comes to mind. SQL, as per the standard, is not even Turing complete. But actual implementations are.

The successful ones always have stuff bolted on. That is the nature of progress.

But consider one of the odd ball ones that I was reminded of recently is 'Erlang'. Doesn't even rate a percentage in Tiobe index. Yet I just found out that someone decided to build another language (Elixir) on top of that one. And someone decided to build an entire business around the usage of that (which is why I even heard of it.)

Steve Naidamast28-Dec-23 6:03

Steve Naidamast

28-Dec-23 6:03

I have done a ton of JavaScript in my very long career...

I never liked it and never will...

JavaScript was never designed for what it is being used for now. And the only reason people use it is because it is free and is part of the inherent infrastructure of web applications.

This still doesn't mean that it is good language due to its popularity.

And languages that continually have things "bolted" on them become bloated and sometimes even unusable. This pushes developers to find cleaner languages...

Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
Black Falcon Software, Inc.
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

jschell28-Dec-23 6:35

28-Dec-23 6:35

Steve Naidamast wrote:
This still doesn't mean that it is good language due to its popularity.

So what is the alternative that is good?

Steve Naidamast wrote:
And languages that continually have things "bolted" on them become bloated and sometimes even unusable.

Unusable? I haven't seen that.

Steve Naidamast wrote:
This pushes developers to find cleaner languages

Never seen anyone claim that.

Certainly seen people choose tech stacks because they liked it.
Certainly seen people use another language just because they wanted to.
Certainly seen people use another tech because they could not figure out how to use the existing tech.
Seen a tech stack used because the owners son recommended switching.

I have only seen one objective decision made about a tech stack and that was a business, not technical, reason. That was because the company that owned the tech stack gave the target company (as a startup) quite a bit of money.

Steve Naidamast28-Dec-23 6:37

Steve Naidamast

28-Dec-23 6:37

Why do you think C# has become so popular when compared to Java?

Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
Black Falcon Software, Inc.
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

jschell29-Dec-23 4:41

29-Dec-23 4:41

Because Microsoft pushed it?

Because the addons have made it more useful in a general sense?

Because Microsoft in various ways provides money to companies that use its products? (I have seen this myself.)

trønderen29-Dec-23 4:57

trønderen

29-Dec-23 4:57

Because of Visual Studio.

Without VS, the number of problem solutions under Windows would have been a small fraction of what it is.
That would have reduced the number of customers finding Windows a viable platform to a fraction.
Which would have reduced MS to a fraction of what it is.

Developing VS and letting individual developers and small businesses use it for free is the best investment MS ever did.

Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.

jschell29-Dec-23 6:20

29-Dec-23 6:20

trønderen wrote:
Because of Visual Studio.

Really good point.

I have used various IDEs over the years and VS beats all of them. So much so that for C# I use it all the time but for Java I almost never use an IDE.

jochance28-Dec-23 6:17

jochance

28-Dec-23 6:17

honey the codewitch wrote:
it's not just for web front ends anymore. JS is an almost virulent technology these days. It needs to be

That is only people carrying around their golden hammer. It's nothing to do with it being "good" or "suited" and they do not care. It's being what web people know and by virtue of the explosion of the internet, web people putting up the numbers.

Except it was always and only ever will be a lead hammer which we never really should've created to begin with.

It's been literally a tyranny of the majority sort of situation now for many years where we must all agree to scratch our itches with angle grinders as a matter of populism.

honey the codewitch29-Dec-23 6:33

29-Dec-23 6:33

As I've come to use it I can't help but agree with you.

This is hours of my life I can't get back.

Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

Julian Ragan28-Dec-23 7:32

Julian Ragan

28-Dec-23 7:32

Any language in which you can write working software is a real programming language. Each and every has its limitations. Although JS is being used in way too many situations, for which it was not well designed. I always thought that it should have been deprecated around 2007 for something more well designed or at least limited to client side basic UI code.

Daniel Wilson 202228-Dec-23 8:06

Daniel Wilson 2022

28-Dec-23 8:06

I'm not sure I could define a "real" programming language, but if I could, JS would fail to meet the definition.

Not declaring variables coupled with case-sensitivity was enough for me to loathe the stuff.

Dan Sutton28-Dec-23 10:47

Dan Sutton

28-Dec-23 10:47

Javascript is filth. I thought everyone knew this. It's because the Document Object Model is filth: you have to have filth in order to process it. The two things together represent the decline of programming as a skill.

inariy29-Dec-23 6:12

inariy

29-Dec-23 6:12

JavaScript is execrable. Node.js is execrable. TypeScript is execrable. Electron is execrable. Programmers must avoid JavaScript. JavaScript is like a cancer.