|
If I click on the Startpage (just plain http://www.codeproject.com/[^]) in the Latest Article section on the filter for C# this gives a nicely filtered list of articles and tips.
If I now switch over to http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/List.aspx?tab=active[^] a filter gets applied: "C#, C#3.5, C#5, C#1.0, C#2.0, C#3.0, C#4.0". Even if there was a filter previously set for Q&A questions.
Ist this an intended "feature"? As far as I can see the filters aren't connected to each other directly. (That means, I can reset the filter in the Q&A manually and am able to see all questions again, but the "Latest articles" list is still filtered by what I originally selected there (e.g. "C#")). And is there a way to "prevent" the site from overwriting the Q&A filter?
Also an interesting side effect: If you select "C++" in the article and follow the quick link to the C# questions in the Q&A you get no results because "Sorry, no entries were found matching tags C#, C++, C++/CLI, C, VC6, VC7, VC7.1, VC8.0, VC9.0, VC10.0, VC11.0, VC12.0"
A better way in my opinion would be to separate those filters from each other. But those preselection isn't really bad for Q&A either. So a quick way to find only e.g. Android questions would also be nice. Why not change the list with the 5 most used tags under the "quick answers" menu to a menu that contains those predefined filters. In addition I'd suggest that if you open the Q&A page through those direct links the custom filter should not be applied (except the "Ignored" tags)
|
|
|
|
|
OK, there is a glitch in the matrix. In the last few days, a lot of submitted articles have been approved of without having a content worth of it ( Check the moderator forum, I am not the only one to think so).
How many people are allowed to approve articles ? I suspect some reputation points harvesting by some users is going on (=with that I mean approving without even checking properly the content).
I have already pointed out in an earlier thread that the rep points requirements for being privileged to moderate publications are too low (should be single based on the status of Author or Authority IMO). I reckon that even I should not be allowed to moderate articles (no Author points, low Authority).
Would it be possible to modify the privileges for limiting the people allowed to approve articles ?
Would it be possible to publish (for editor only) the name of the people approving articles, so that we can debate about their opinion concerning the article content ?
Thanks.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: lot of submitted articles have been approved of without having a content worth of it Just that! In the last week or so I saw a lot of 'article' I reported as 'Wrong type' and saw after an hour as approved, while it's obvious it's not an article...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hm. No issues with Chrome 34
(Although the URL looks a bit strange with that "HowplustoplusUseplusSSHplustoplusAccessplusaplusLi" at the end )
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe those Net Nazis again.
Nicholas Marty wrote: HowplustoplusUseplusSSHplustoplusAccessplusaplusLi
that intrigues me too. Maybe a replacement for "+"?
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Ah... I see the images aren't hosted on CP servers. Maybe this is causing the issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. My thoughts exactly.
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
I've been seeing a lot of that ... even swapped browsers but still got the issue. Went to inform OP on one article and they "magically" appeared!! CP servers might be under some stress ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it... it's currently third from the bottom in my (default) view...
|
|
|
|
|
sorry sir.i Couldn't see it
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Be that as it may, it's definitely there!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have Updated The Question .But It doesn't Show top of the Page
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't understand, the question shows in the unanswered queue. Have you checked that you are not using some filter in your QA listing?
|
|
|
|
|
With this control, we presently experience some regression of its quality, couple last days or so.
In the past, one could easily click on it: moving the mouse pointer into the bounding rectangle of the star showed index-finger icon, and the click worked.
Not right now. Now it happens only if the mouse pointer is positioned one the top ray of the 5-rayed star. At first, it creates the impression that the voting is disabled…
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 1-May-14 1:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - I'm on it
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
See my reply, please.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much, Chris.
And I provided new steps to reproduce on the changed behavior of comment posting and rendering.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser and on which page? I can't replicate the issue.
Found and fixed. Deploy tomorrow after testing.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 29-Apr-14 23:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I just re-tested it; it works now.
Thank you very much, Chris.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I just answered a question dated from end of 2012, that was presented to me at the top of the 'All Questions' list.
And I can't figure out why this post came to this place ^^
[Flags]
public enum Bool {
True, False, ForSure, Maybe, ProbablyNot, Depends, NotDecidedYet, Undefined
}
private interface IShy { }
modified 29-Apr-14 15:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably got moved to the front page due to some spam activity.
|
|
|
|