|
Actually, I just got a couple of those same errors on Web23 when reporting more spam in Q/A. Doing more updates or are there more issues lurking about?
|
|
|
|
|
I am getting it while deleting them quite frequently. Assuming nobody is working right now... there is some issue that needs a lookup!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately a known issue.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Even after clicking the Report button in Quick Answers its again visible there.But its difficult to identify which answer we reported if we have situations like today's spammer attacks in Quick Answers section.As per design?
|
|
|
|
|
By design (ie We haven't implemented that kind of feedback yet  )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject appeared HUGE in my browser today and no matter how many times I tried to reload and restart the browser, it wouldn't get back to normal.
Does CP have some sort of mobile mode? Maybe it's detecting my browser as a mobile one?
I'm using Safari 4.0.5 on OS X 10.6.3.
Once I clicked new message, strangely, everything got fine.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we have a mobile version
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I guess isMobile() isn't working perfectly 
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Did you accidentally enable zoom?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, definitely no. I even tried to reset the zoom, but nothing happened.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
rastaVnuce wrote: We are using Linux daily to UP our productivityobnoxious snobbery - so UP yours!
IFTFY. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: UP yours!
That's the part intended for the likes of you 
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Thereby proving my point more emphatically than I ever could have on my own. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Oh... there was a point? Sorry, I missed that.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't been to the New User registration page in almost 10 years, and given the suudden rash of spam crap that's infiltrating the site, I logged out so I could see what was requested.
I was SHOCKED to see that absolutely no mechanism appears to be in place to verify that someone signing up isn't a bot or some such thing.
You guys really need to improve that area of the site.
I think maybe someone should be enjoined from posting anything for AT LEAST 48 hours after signing up on the site. If that seems too harsh, then prevent messages with URLs from being posted until the person reaches silver status. We have to take proactive steps to keep this crap from happening.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Cripling accounts for legit new users is not the way to go. A captcha of some sort appears to be needed badly...
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
CAPTCHA won't work - these accounts are created manually.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - it sucks to do it, but we have to do something until the problem is resolved with a better solution.
On the bright side, we're getting a lot of organizer points (I think).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: On the bright side, we're getting a lot of organizer points (I think).
You might be... I'm too busy at the moment stomping on bugs at work to stomp on the spamming vermin.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
While I'm not a big fan of them, it might be time to move the sign up to captchas. At least there would have to be some human intervention at t'other side.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Do we have any email verification before user activation?
|
|
|
|
|
We do, it's not enforced, but after today it will be.
This has wasted everyone's time
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: This has wasted everyone's time
Its better than seeing those spammers in the boards again.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I used many WYSIWYG html editors in my site but finally I get annoyed with 'em. They are just too crap, adding useless tags and increase html length for nothing. But then I thought to develop a pure HTML editor where you can write limited html tags, something like CP's. So when I was about to complete I realised that lines do not appear same as html. So I thought that just simply replace '\r\n' with '<br />', but something came in mind what about lines in pre tag. They are not suppose to be replace by '<br />', then I opened CP's editor and in Preview I saw they are doing same. However, I didn't expect that, because if you are using pre tag then why need a '<br />' for each line.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
