|
I'm not sure if the staff is already aware of this (which they should be, since the error message says the administrator has been informed), but I'm getting the following error message a lot when trying to open a question in QA:
Ticket: 2379171
Error: An error occurred in this page. The error has been recorded and the site administrator informed.
Going back to the list and trying to open the question again usually works, but not every time.
Would someone please look into this? 
![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Just been updating the site. It should be good now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cool, thanks. 
Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I just got a couple of those same errors on Web23 when reporting more spam in Q/A. Doing more updates or are there more issues lurking about?
|
|
|
|
|
I am getting it while deleting them quite frequently. Assuming nobody is working right now... there is some issue that needs a lookup!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately a known issue.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Even after clicking the Report button in Quick Answers its again visible there.But its difficult to identify which answer we reported if we have situations like today's spammer attacks in Quick Answers section.As per design?
|
|
|
|
|
By design (ie We haven't implemented that kind of feedback yet  )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject appeared HUGE in my browser today and no matter how many times I tried to reload and restart the browser, it wouldn't get back to normal.
Does CP have some sort of mobile mode? Maybe it's detecting my browser as a mobile one?
I'm using Safari 4.0.5 on OS X 10.6.3.
Once I clicked new message, strangely, everything got fine.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we have a mobile version
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I guess isMobile() isn't working perfectly
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Did you accidentally enable zoom?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, definitely no. I even tried to reset the zoom, but nothing happened.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
rastaVnuce wrote: We are using Linux daily to UP our productivityobnoxious snobbery - so UP yours!
IFTFY. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: UP yours!
That's the part intended for the likes of you 
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Thereby proving my point more emphatically than I ever could have on my own. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Oh... there was a point? Sorry, I missed that.
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity - so UP yours!
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't been to the New User registration page in almost 10 years, and given the suudden rash of spam crap that's infiltrating the site, I logged out so I could see what was requested.
I was SHOCKED to see that absolutely no mechanism appears to be in place to verify that someone signing up isn't a bot or some such thing.
You guys really need to improve that area of the site.
I think maybe someone should be enjoined from posting anything for AT LEAST 48 hours after signing up on the site. If that seems too harsh, then prevent messages with URLs from being posted until the person reaches silver status. We have to take proactive steps to keep this crap from happening.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Cripling accounts for legit new users is not the way to go. A captcha of some sort appears to be needed badly...
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
CAPTCHA won't work - these accounts are created manually.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - it sucks to do it, but we have to do something until the problem is resolved with a better solution.
On the bright side, we're getting a lot of organizer points (I think).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: On the bright side, we're getting a lot of organizer points (I think).
You might be... I'm too busy at the moment stomping on bugs at work to stomp on the spamming vermin.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
While I'm not a big fan of them, it might be time to move the sign up to captchas. At least there would have to be some human intervention at t'other side.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Do we have any email verification before user activation?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
