|
Chris Maunder wrote: No need to come out with guns blazing from the get-go.
That's not the JSOP way.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: No need to come out with guns blazing from the get-go.
Who me?
Actually, there *is* a need... 
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
<glances down at your sig. Glances back up. Rolls eyes slightly.>
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I can definitely take care of the problem for you. The end justifies the means.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
There are at least 200 new spammer accounts that were registered *today* (with the word cialis and/or viagra in them)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Friday, April 30, 2010 6:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the techniques mentioned are already in place, and some would make using the site extremely painful if you were, say, behind a firewall. CAPTCHA, while effective against automated attacks, is useless against manual spam. And it's very, very cheap to have spam posted manually.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to reply to Abhinev's answer to todays CCC and was informed that the message was already posted.
Er... No It Wasn't!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Odd, It took a reply afterwards, but only when I reworded it.
Strange goings on.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Go and buy a lottery ticket. You may have just had a CRC collision.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
[AGOG] Really?
"But Professor, the odds against that must be phenomenal!"
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if the options are a bug vs. a one in 4 billion random event then clearly has to be a CRC collision, right?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I am off to buy that lottery ticket in a clear case of Occam's Strop!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
If there are 4 billion possible hashes, then there is a 1 in 4,000 chance of posting a duplicate hash (given the 1 million messages already in the Lounge, assuming these hashes are forum specific). Perhaps more likely than you think. Maybe you should point the hash to the original message (so, once you find a collision, you can confirm it by comparing the actual messages).
|
|
|
|
|
what algorithm you are using, I would prefer this[^]
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
A recently posted thread in The Lounge[^] made me think about one of the main problems we non-native-English-speakers face daily: since English is the primary language on which every tech is developed, almost every documentation is in such language. It usually takes time to find docs in our own language, spanning even years, and more often than not it's not as accurate as the original (I for once prefer reading the MSDN docs in English rather than my native Spanish, for such reason, but then again I've been studying English since I can remember and not too many people have had the same chances I had).
Since The Code Project is full of international members, I think it would be nice to have the possibility of localizing an article. Say, I publish an article in English and I could also provide a Spanish translation for it. Then a reader can choose to watch the article in either language (perhaps a little flag at the top or something). Furthermore, perhaps someone could contribute with a German translation, making it available in yet another language.
I'm aware that such a thing would imply a great effort. But I think that there are many gains, since it would make Code Project available to a bigger audience, and thus opening the doors to many other markets.
I know that you guys have been busy with the latest improvements on the site. But maybe in some time when you're asking yourselves: what could we include for our next milestone, this might be an interesting option to consider.
Just a thought.
Best regards.
modified on Friday, April 30, 2010 1:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I like it, as long as the 'main' version of the article is in English (or there is at lease a English translation present)
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the article submission wizard can be modified to allow posting of alternative language versions of an article ONLY if the article has already been posted and approved in English.
The problem I foresee is that the article text could change dramatically between the English and non-Enlish version, and people could take advantage of the fact that not so many people will speak their language.
In the end, I think we should maintain our current English-only status.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
We may actually be able to do that quite easily, actually.
We've been thinking about this a lot over the years and it has it's pros and cons (as John has pointed out, so it'll need some thinking (and, obviously, time  )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to block the messages which contain alexcastelli.com? All the spam messages that are posted, link to that website.
You could probably have a list of spam websites and not allow any message to be posted when it contains any of those links. The list could also be auto updated by regular members who report messages as spam or some kind of mechanism.
modified on Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 Good idea!
Wikipedia does the same thing: a blacklist with URLs from unwanted hosts, see Wikipedia:Spam_blacklist[^]. Spammers want to push their websites and when all of them are black listed they probably lose their interest.
/M
|
|
|
|
|
what if they use tinyurl.com
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Tarakeshwar Reddy wrote: You could probably have a list of spam websites and not allow any message to be posted when it contains any of those links
Ah, but the problem is that spammer setup landing pages on legitimate sites in order to post links on other pages that will not be spotted as spam. Have you visited alexcastelli.com? He's an Italian kid with a blog site that looks to have been hijacked. 24hrs later and the spammers have moved onto other sites.
Blocking URLs is about as effective as blocking IP addresses.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
the user ID "cialis for men"
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Lots of them with new ID's are back! 
Looks like they pick only answered questions for it. 0 replies one are not spammed. Strange!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
Now with 26% more Twitter