How to Test Private and Protected methods in .NET






4.83/5 (68 votes)
Mar 1, 2005
7 min read

504481

2196
This article explains some theory behind testing/not testing private methods, and then provides and walks through a downloadable code sample to demonstrate these testing techniques.
Introduction
Test Driven Development is the practice of (1) writing tests, (2) writing code that passes those tests, and (3) then refactoring. This concept is becoming very popular in the .NET community due to the quality assurance that it adds. While it is easy to test public methods, the natural question emerges "How do I test protected and private methods?"
This article will:
- Summarize some key points of the "Should-you-even-test private methods debate"?
- Make the case that it is still useful to at least know how to test private and protected methods - regardless of which side of the debate you're on.
- Provide the theory and downloadable code sample to demonstrate these testing techniques.
Background Theory
Should You Test Private Methods?
A Google search will show you that there's a lot of debate about using private methods, let alone testing them. The table below summarizes some of the common views of the pro and con for both issues.
Pro | Con | |
Use private methods |
|
|
Test private methods |
|
|
There are bright and experienced people on both sides of the issue. So while I have no intention or expectation of ending the "should I test private method" debate, there is still value for both sides to know how to test them. Even if you think that private methods should not be tested:
- Your opinion will be more influential if you can at least show that you are able to test them, but choose not to (i.e. you're not saying "Don't test private methods" simply because you don't know how).
- Having the option of testing non-public methods lets you see what really works best for your team over time.
- As long as there are still some valid situations, it's worth having a convenient way to test them.
Good Criteria and Inadequate Techniques
Andrew Hunt and David Thomas explain in their book, Pragmatic Unit Testing in C# with NUnit, that good unit tests are ATRIP:
- Automatic
- Thorough
- Repeatable
- Independent
- Professional
There are three additional criteria that any testing overhead for private/protected methods should meet:
- Transparency - Don't alter the System Under Test (SUT), such as adding wrapper methods in the production code.
- Scope - Be able to run in both Debug and Release mode.
- Simplicity - Have minimal overhead, and hence be easy to change and simple enough to introduce minimal risk.
Keeping these criteria in mind, there are several strategies that fall short:
Strategy | Problem |
Don't have any private methods. |
|
Use the directives #if DEBUG ... #endif
to wrap a public method which in turns wraps the private method. The unit tests
can now indirectly access that private method through the public wrapper. (This
is a method that I myself have used many times, and found it to be tedious and
non-object oriented). |
|
Use the [Conditional("DEBUG")] attribute
on public methods that wrap the private methods. |
|
Create internal methods to access the private method; then have a public test class elsewhere in the assembly that wraps those internal methods with public ones. |
|
Testing Protected Methods
A protected method is visible only to derived classes, therefore it is not
immediately available to a test suite. For example, suppose we wanted to test
the method from ClassLibrary1.MyObject
:
protected string MyProtectedMethod(string strInput, int i32Value)
{
return this.Name + ": " + strInput + ", " +
i32Value.ToString();
}
The book Pragmatic
Unit Testing in C# with NUnit explains one solution: make a derived class
MyObjectTester
that inherits class MyObject
, and then
create a public method TestMyProtectedMethod
that wraps the
protected one. For example:
public new string TestMyProtectedMethod(string strInput, int i32Value)
{
return base.MyProtectedMethod(strInput,
i32Value);
}
This approach is simple, yet meets all the criteria:
Criteria | Fulfillment |
Transparency | By using inheritance and putting the
MyObjectTester class in the UnitTests assembly, it
doesn't add any new code to the production assembly. |
Scope | Nothing in this approach depends on Debug-only techniques. |
Simplicity | Although this approach requires a new derived class, and an additional public wrapper method for each protected method, it is object-oriented and type safe. |
Testing Private Methods
Testing private methods is a little more involved; but we can still do it using System.Reflection. You can use Reflection to dynamically access methods of a type, including both instance and static private methods. Note that accessing private methods does require the ReflectionPermission, but that is not a problem for Unit Tests running on a development machine or build server.
Suppose we wanted to test the private method MyPrivateMethod
from ClassLibrary1.MyObject
:
private string MyPrivateMethod(string strInput, DateTime dt, double
dbl)
{
return this.Name + ": " + strInput + ", " +
dt.ToString() + ", " + dbl.ToString();
}
One solution is to create a UnitTestUtilities project with a helper class to
call the test method via reflection. For example, the download solution has the
following methods in UnitTestUtilities.Helper
:
public static object RunStaticMethod(System.Type t, string strMethod,
object [] aobjParams)
{
BindingFlags eFlags =
BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.NonPublic;
return RunMethod(t, strMethod,
null, aobjParams, eFlags);
} //end of method
public static object RunInstanceMethod(System.Type t, string strMethod,
object objInstance, object [] aobjParams)
{
BindingFlags eFlags = BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.NonPublic;
return RunMethod(t, strMethod,
objInstance, aobjParams, eFlags);
} //end of method
private static object RunMethod(System.Type t, string
strMethod, object objInstance, object [] aobjParams, BindingFlags eFlags)
{
MethodInfo m;
try
{
m = t.GetMethod(strMethod, eFlags);
if (m == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException("There is no method '" +
strMethod + "' for type '" + t.ToString() + "'.");
}
object objRet = m.Invoke(objInstance, aobjParams);
return objRet;
}
catch
{
throw;
}
} //end of method
Private method RunMethod
takes in the necessary parameters that
Reflection needs to invoke a method, and then returns the value. It has two
public methods that wrap this: RunStaticMethod
and
RunInstanceMethod
for static and instance methods respectively.
Walking through RunMethod
, it first gets the MethodInfo
from a type. Because we expect this to only be called for existing
methods, a null method triggers an Exception
. Once we have the
MethodInfo
, we can invoke the method given the instantiated object
(null
for static methods) and the parameter array.
We could use this Utility in an NUnit test like so:
[Test] public void TestPrivateInstanceMethod()
{
string strExpected = "MyName: Hello, 5/24/2004
12:00:00 AM, 2.1";
ClassLibrary1.MyObject objInstance
= new MyObject("MyName");
object obj =
UnitTestUtilities.Helper.RunInstanceMethod(
typeof(ClassLibrary1.MyObject), "MyPrivateMethod",
objInstance, new object[3] {"Hello",
new DateTime(2004,05,24), 2.1});
string strActual = Convert.ToString(obj);
Assert.AreEqual(strExpected,strActual);
}
Criteria | Fulfillment |
Transparency | The only extra code we created -
UnitTestUtilities , is not shipped in production. |
Scope | Nothing in this approach depends on Debug-only techniques. |
Simplicity | This approach can call any method with a single call.
Once you have the UnitTestUtilities , the only complication is
creating the correct parameters (method name, data types, etc...) for
RunInstanceMethod or RunStaticMethod . Because the
method is being dynamically called, the parameters aren't checked at compile
time. |
Conclusion
While there is a debate on whether or not to test private methods, at least
we have the ability to do so. We can test protected methods using inheritance to
create a derived TesterClass
that wraps the base protected methods
with public ones. We can test private methods using Reflection, which can be
abstracted to a UnitTestUtility
helper class. Both of these
techniques can help to improve test coverage.