|
Hi Chris,
thank you for looking into this ... 
About your point " ... but are those values, well, of value ... " I am not sure, either...
Being "exact-minded" I would be tempted to avoid "there is something
uncertain/unknown over here ..."-feeling caused by multicast poll results .
On the other hand, perhaps it is not that important as any poll is only somehow indicative
BR
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Shouldn't the spam post of a user be removed as well, or disable the links in the messages, after a user account has been removed?
|
|
|
|
|
Which account or message/article?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was closed and only viewable by moderators. I’ve refreshed the cache and it’s gone.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Couldn't sign in, clearing textbox style would help, but on mouse over it hidden again!
I did not upgrade my Chrome to latest yet though.
However, using FireFox works for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using an ad-blocker? They tend to be the culprit when random elements of the site go missing.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I reported an article aprox an hour ago due to "Format / Layout issues" and I saw later that the guy was editing it. But the article now is two times in moderation.
When I looked into the "Versions list" of the articles, it landed in a closed previous version due to poor quality (so I suppose the guy want to improve and expand the content)
I don't know if he reposted it without noticing or is a possible bug.
I know I could delete one version, but I prefer to give the possibility to dig in.
Version #1: How to build Analyzers and code fixes by Roslyn using VS2019[^]
Version #2: How to build Analyzers and code fixes by Roslyn using VS2019[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 28-Nov-19 2:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
-- modified 27-Nov-19 13:10pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Icon problem[^] seems to have sneaked in.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Your link is something recursive. In case you refer to the report of Nelek, from my point of view the "Icon Problem" has not been solved yet, more it became worse
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll look into it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any problems. if you are concerned about your icon, you are not a member of the Protector group. You have the ability to moderate articles due to your massive reputation.
We add people to the Protector group that we trust, and may not have the reputation points necessary to moderate articles.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't reporting that for myself; the icon for protectors was wrong, I never told about mine.
On yesterday the proper icon seemed to be back.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
I corroborate what phil.o says... My badge is back
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been writing up an article and just before I go to publish I thought "Ooo! A spell check! I need that!" So ... I pressed the button.
And it shows a dialog, and hangs:
Close button does nothing, Cancel does nothing - it just sits there.
And if I try to open it again to see how much I have saved, it just says:  Cp is whitelisted and shows greyed out on the page.
Please don't tell me it's all gone ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
There is an auto-saved version of an article you have been working on today. You should be able to open it and continue editing it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - but when I try to open the article from my articles list, the content source appears briefly, then all I see is the ad blocker message. I can't see anything else on the page which lets me load a previous or autosaved version.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hang on - If I press the "source" button, it looks to be there.
Ah! Preview works - but I can't edit it in WYSIWYMGIYAL* mode.
Save that version, and edit it again, and ... I still can't see it.
I'll try closing the spellcheck-version-tab and see if that helps ... Nope.
I'll hit "Publish" and hope.
It worked!
* What You See Is What You Might Get If You Are Lucky
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
... except all my images are gone ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OK - if I open it to edit on the Surface, it opens, and images are visible.
The preview shows the images as well.
Press Publish, and the images go through as well.
So it's all working - but can you disable the spell checker for the moment as I'm pretty sure it caused this, somehow ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Now this is getting weird.
I have the desktop and Surface side-by-side and viewing the same article: Adventures in 3D Printing Part 3: Making complex apertures - recovering from the Bends.[^]
On the Surface, it looks fine. All the changes - including some typo fixing I did on the Surface a few minutes ago - are there.
On the desktop ... the first image is there, but all the others are missing. The text - including typo fixes - is all there, but there aren't even placeholders for most of the images.
I can edit it on the Surface, but on the desktop I get "your ad blocker..."
Both are running Win10: 1903 (OS Build 18362.476) on the desktop, 1809 (OS Build 17736.864) on the Surface; Chrome Version 78.0.3904.108 (Official Build) (64-bit) on both.
Not sure why the surface is running older Windows, but ... I can't see it being that.
I confused. Anything you want me to try, let me know ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I was able to recreate this issue.
I have uBlock on my Chrome with codeproject.com allowed and got the same error you did.
It seems that you also need to allow cdn2.developermedia.com. For some reason, when uBlock prevents the loading of a.min.js, our ad serving script, I breaks some other JavaScript. I'm not sure how this happens, but will investigate.
So you appear to have two options, disable uBlock while editing articles, or added an excpetion for developermedia.com.
I'm assuming that the Surface does not have an enabled adBlocker.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting ... both running uBlock with CP whitelisted.
No white- or black-list for developermedia.com on either ...
Added developermedia.com to whitelist, and the images are still missing.
Added cdn.developermedia.com to whitelist and they appear, but I still get the adblocker message when I edit it.
Investigating ... Oh fer Elephant's sake! Kasp-bloody-ersky has added a sodding ad blocker as well!
Disable that, and it all looks fine.
Sorry about that - Kaspersky obviously updated itself today and added a pile of crap, it just hasn['t got round to the Surface yet ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
i'm sure they mean well, but damn they can break things in the process.
Changing how you system works, in this case your browser, should require an explicit opt-in. If we hadn't investigated, you probably would have thought that Chrome or the OS were at fault.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
