Introduction
There are a substantial number of Windows programmers who insist, often very
vehemently, that a programmer should avoid overriding PreTranslateMessage
. They
have their reasons for saying so and I believe they are correct. But in this
article my intention is not to contemplate on whether PreTranslateMessage
is
good for you or whether you should avoid it like the plague. I have found that
PreTranslateMessage
can come in quite handy in dialog-based applications for
handling keyboard messages. In addition to using PreTranslateMessage
I also show
you how you can override ProcessMessageFilter
for handling accelerator keys in a
dialog based application.
Using PreTranslateMessage to handle dialog keystrokes
Very often you hear questions from novice programmers asking how they can
trap keystrokes in a dialog based application. Presumably they tried to handle
WM_KEYDOWN/WM_KEYUP
unsuccessfully. The whole problem is that in a dialog based
application the focus is always on one of the child controls and not on the main
dialog window. So what do you need to do? You need to override
PreTranslateMessage
. I'll show you a simple example.
Suppose that you have a dialog based app with a lot of edit boxes on the
dialog. It's basically a data entry program and thus you feel it would make it
easier for the end-user if pressing the ENTER key would take the focus to the
next edit box, just as if he had pressed TAB. The solution is so very easy and
straightforward with PreTranslateMessage
as I'll demonstrate below.
BOOL CPreTransTestDlg::PreTranslateMessage(MSG* pMsg)
{
if(pMsg->message==WM_KEYDOWN)
{
if(pMsg->wParam==VK_RETURN)
pMsg->wParam=VK_TAB;
}
return CDialog::PreTranslateMessage(pMsg);
}
All I have done is to check whether the message is a WM_KEYDOWN
, and if it is
so, then I check to see if the wParam
is VK_RETURN
. If I find it so, I change the
wParam
to VK_TAB
and then the base class implementation is called. Easy huh?
Using ProcessMessageFilter to handle dialog-based accelerator keys
Let's say you have a menu in your dialog based app. And you have an
accelerator key for some particular task. You'll soon be disappointed to find
that the hotkey does not work. The problem is that the modal dialog app's
message loop does not call TranslateAccelerator
. I do not know why this is so.
Presumable the Microsoft team decided that people shouldn't use dialog based
apps to write complicated applications, with hotkeys and menus.
But as usual they have suggested a workaround too. Here's is how you go about
implementing it. I'd like to state again, that even though this is a Microsoft
recommended technique there will be a good majority of MFC gurus, like Joseph
Newcomer for example, who would tell you that you shouldn't be doing this. But
then sometimes you have to sacrifice elegance for getting things done quickly
and with minimum effort.
- Add a member variable to your
CWinApp
derived class.
HACCEL m_haccel;
Use the resource editor to create a new Accelerator, by default it will be
named IDR_ACCELERATOR1. And add a new accelerator key that is a short cut
for some menu item. Put the following line in your InitInstance
just before the line where the
CDialog
derived object is declared
m_haccel=LoadAccelerators(AfxGetInstanceHandle(),
MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDR_ACCELERATOR1));
Now override ProcessMessageFilter
and modify the function so that it looks
like :-
BOOL CPreTransTestApp::ProcessMessageFilter(int code, LPMSG lpMsg)
{
if(m_haccel)
{
if (::TranslateAccelerator(m_pMainWnd->m_hWnd, m_haccel, lpMsg))
return(TRUE);
}
return CWinApp::ProcessMessageFilter(code, lpMsg);
}
All we did was to call TranslateAccelerator
and if it succeeds then we don't
need to call the base class ProcessMessageFilter
, as the message has been
handled. So we return TRUE
.
Disclaimer
The author wishes to state here that the two methods mentioned above are
generally used methods and the author is not in any way endorsing these methods.
Users should read more on the usage of PreTranslateMessage
and
ProcessMessageFilter
before they use it in their programs.
Nish Nishant is a technology enthusiast from Columbus, Ohio. He has over 20 years of software industry experience in various roles including Chief Technology Officer, Senior Solution Architect, Lead Software Architect, Principal Software Engineer, and Engineering/Architecture Team Leader. Nish is a 14-time recipient of the Microsoft Visual C++ MVP Award.
Nish authored C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications in 2005, and co-authored Extending MFC Applications with the .NET Framework for Addison Wesley in 2003. In addition, he has over 140 published technology articles on CodeProject.com and another 250+ blog articles on his WordPress blog. Nish is experienced in technology leadership, solution architecture, software architecture, cloud development (AWS and Azure), REST services, software engineering best practices, CI/CD, mentoring, and directing all stages of software development.
Nish's Technology Blog :
voidnish.wordpress.com